In all analyses statistical significance was set at p In the Fig Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by Analytical study Generalized linear patterns had been employed for linear regression data (Pearson’s R relationship) to evaluate the new association away from urinary Na + and you will K + excretion having SBP. To have Figs. dos and step three, two-means ANOVA that have Tukey’s blog post hoc is did evaluate SBP one of several communities discussed on the basis of urinary Na + and you may K + removal. So you’re able to assess the potency of expanding urinary Na + and K + excretion in accordance with SBP, Cohn’s Impression Size are determined. Within the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 general Pearson’s Roentgen correlation are did to evaluate the fresh new association of your own urinary Na + :K + removal proportion that have SBP. six investigation was indeed analyzed by a beneficial about three-means ANOVA and pairwise evaluations have been made playing with Tukey’s blog post hoc try. seven relative regularity shipment are assessed using a great Gaussian match study. 05 (GraphPad prism application, version 8). Research was displayed due to the fact suggest ± SD. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range Baseline SBP relative to urinary sodium to potassium removal ratio (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation out of standard SBP (mainly based adjustable) along side whole range of urinary Na + /K + excretion (separate adjustable), (Pearson’s R 2 having salt painful and sensitive = 0.0004 and you may salt unwilling = 0.0016) (b) standard SBP considering alterations in sodium removal and you will potassium excretion assortment within the sodium delicate (letter = 186) and you may salt resistant (n = 222) anybody in the evaluation to their regular diet, opinions revealed because the mean ± SD. Study was assessed because of the around three-method ANOVA with pairwise review followed by Tukey’s blog post hoc sample. Correlation regarding SBP philosophy across the whole list of urinary sodium in order to potassium removal (Na + /K + ) ratio in the salt delicate (n = 71) and you may sodium unwilling (n = 119) people with diet intervention of the Slimming down Remedies for Stop Blood pressure (DASH) (a) highest salt (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen dos having salt painful and sensitive = 0.04 and salt unwilling = 0.04) (b) lower salt (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s R dos to own salt painful and sensitive = 0.02 and you will salt unwilling = 0.00002).

In the Fig

Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends

Analytical study

Generalized linear patterns had been employed for linear regression data (Pearson’s R relationship) to evaluate the new association away from urinary Na jak dziaÅ‚a sugardaddie + and you will K + excretion having SBP. To have Figs. dos and step three, two-means ANOVA that have Tukey’s blog post hoc is did evaluate SBP one of several communities discussed on the basis of urinary Na + and you may K + removal. So you’re able to assess the potency of expanding urinary Na + and K + excretion in accordance with SBP, Cohn’s Impression Size are determined. Within the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 general Pearson’s Roentgen correlation are did to evaluate the fresh new association of your own urinary Na + :K + removal proportion that have SBP. six investigation was indeed analyzed by a beneficial about three-means ANOVA and pairwise evaluations have been made playing with Tukey’s blog post hoc try. seven relative regularity shipment are assessed using a great Gaussian match study. 05 (GraphPad prism application, version 8). Research was displayed due to the fact suggest ± SD.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1.99 g/day, values shown as mean ± SD. b Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range urinary potassium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.001 and salt resistant = 0.008), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

Baseline SBP relative to urinary sodium to potassium removal ratio (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation out of standard SBP (mainly based adjustable) along side whole range of urinary Na + /K + excretion (separate adjustable), (Pearson’s R 2 having salt painful and sensitive = 0.0004 and you may salt unwilling = 0.0016) (b) standard SBP considering alterations in sodium removal and you will potassium excretion assortment within the sodium delicate (letter = 186) and you may salt resistant (n = 222) anybody in the evaluation to their regular diet, opinions revealed because the mean ± SD. Study was assessed because of the around three-method ANOVA with pairwise review followed by Tukey’s blog post hoc sample.

Correlation regarding SBP philosophy across the whole list of urinary sodium in order to potassium removal (Na + /K + ) ratio in the salt delicate (n = 71) and you may sodium unwilling (n = 119) people with diet intervention of the Slimming down Remedies for Stop Blood pressure (DASH) (a) highest salt (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen dos having salt painful and sensitive = 0.04 and salt unwilling = 0.04) (b) lower salt (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s R dos to own salt painful and sensitive = 0.02 and you will salt unwilling = 0.00002).