Grams.) The wedding out-of Draw MEEKS and Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

He ordered and you may improved right here what turned into his household on next 22 ages as well as on this place all of the students have been created but both earliest. When you look at the 1891 he offered it family and you will ordered part 32 inside block ten in the four kilometers northeast of Chillicothe, he improved and you can left as the a property-stead.

Bound to help you and you can licensed in advance of myself, which twenty-first day of Oct

His Christian life extended through a time period of more 40 years. The guy stored securely with the Primitive Baptist faith, and this turned his whole consolation within his history months by one another precepts and you may example he portrayed the greatest variety of an American resident.

Draw MEEKS’ next marriage, in order to Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] was Sep 21, 1858 into the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. There is nothing identified in the a married relationship so you can a good COHEN other than the marriage permit, submitted at Matrimony Guide 1, page 914, ideas the marriage given that between age, and you may Sarah produced their unique mark. The marriage was performed from the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

We, T. T. KERLEY, perform solemnly claim that i was 21 years of age, which Skip W. C. MEEKS is actually 18/eight years of age, and this there are not any courtroom arguments to our Relationships. J. C. WELLS becoming bound says your parents of Miss W. C. MEEKS have given its complete say yes to the marriage of their daughter to help you Mr. T.

Sarah and you may Mark lived to the west of Haynesville in the Claiborne Parish having a little while together with most likely one child, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the latest wife out-of T. All of the family unit members records signify Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY was created November 30, 1865, at Vow, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, while the grave marker suggests a romantic date out of beginning out of 1865. I would suggest, although not, that day from birth may have in fact become November 29, 1863 in lieu of one day in 1865. Without a doubt, there is absolutely no delivery certificate. This new death certification is not any help, as it indicates a romantic date regarding birth of November 29, 1886, more five years after the day regarding her relationships. It will suggest a get older on death of 52, and since the fresh passing took place January sixteen, 1919, she’d was in fact produced when you look at the 1866, deciding to make the 1886 probably a great typographical error. To get the different beginning date, I have around three arguments:

  • This new census taker in 1870, functioning August 23, 1870, revealed that the fresh baby’s age is nine. While you are census takers is notoriously crappy within age, it is extremely unusual, I do believe, for that more youthful a baby having a beginning day one far. It would only be three years incorrect into the corrected day in the place of five years wrong into 1965 date. The newest 1880 census taker noted the age as 18, once more too-old to possess possibly big date and you will completely wrong since before their particular 100 gratis datingsida pГҐ ryska marriage, discussed below, whenever she was not but really 18.
  • The most severe disagreement You will find is the wedding licenses, duplicated verbatim toward profile ?. There are two main changes to the published setting, the initial being the demands your lady be at the least to get yrs old instead of parental agree, and also the second getting that the out-dated setting is published for usage to your first around three digits of your own day getting «187″, that is entered upon inform you a date regarding Oct 21, 1881. Having a great November 29th birthday celebration and stay seventeen, the year regarding delivery must be 1863. If she really was ten in lieu of about 30 days shy out of to get, manage brand new clerk have approved the word of the groom’s cousin the bride’s moms and dads approved the marriage?